Wikipedia:城市論壇 (提議)/歸檔/2022年6月

出自維基百科,自由嘅百科全書
Archive 呢版係以往討論嘅歸檔,請唔好改呢版。如果你想發起新嘅討論或者重開家下嘅討論,請係家下討論頁做,唔該。

呢次嘅歸檔係由Shinjiman2022年7月20號 (三) 05:24 (UTC)做嘅。[回覆]

Sandbox link[編輯]

Apologies for writing in English. Please feel free to translate my text.

I'm holding a global RFC regarding Sandbox link (example) at Meta: m:Requests for comment/Enable sandbox for all Wikipedias. I was told by User:Lucas Werkmeister that Cantonese Wikipedia as a large project does not have Sandbox link enabled.

  • Does Cantonese Wikipedia want the Sandbox link enabled?

If there is consensus for enabling that on Cantonese Wikipedia, I will do that as part of the global settings. But if Cantonese Wikipedia does not want that, I can simply omit the Cantonese Wikipedia from my proposal. No hard feelings at all :) I have personally not found Sandbox links harmful in any way, shape, or form. Thanks 4nn1l2 (傾偈) 2022年2月19號 (六) 03:05 (UTC)[回覆]

Personally I won't oppose this idea at all, however there's need to see what's that page name of the sandbox that's linking to. At least three of them are possible. Including "Sandbox", "sandbox" and "沙盤" where those names can be canonical and in the native language respectively. It's not a big deal as well as the other two can be make as redirect to the one that's chosen to. Shinjiman 2022年2月19號 (六) 03:16 (UTC)[回覆]
That can be whatever Cantonese Wikipedia wants and admins of this project can determine it by editing MediaWiki:Sandboxlink-portlet-label. Anyone else can do the same thing from translatewiki.net. 4nn1l2 (傾偈) 2022年2月19號 (六) 03:27 (UTC)[回覆]
Just to clarify that it's not the name of the label of the Sandbox, it's the page name that's link to the Sandbox, i.e. Special:MyPage/Sandbox vs Special:MyPage/sandbox vs Special:MyPage/沙盤Shinjiman 2022年2月19號 (六) 06:14 (UTC)[回覆]
You have control over that too. Just edit MediaWiki:Sandboxlink-subpage-name. 4nn1l2 (傾偈) 2022年2月19號 (六) 06:28 (UTC)[回覆]

應該喺「城市論壇」道新增「新聞」一欄[編輯]

如題……大家唔難發現,「技術」一欄絶大部分嘅嘢都係由英文版走過嚟嘅通知,冇嘢好傾,根本唔同類。--110.174.132.162討論2022年5月23號 (一) 13:40 (UTC)[回覆]

如果想分開一頁擺技術新聞,我覺得唔使限死喺「城市論壇」入面做,而係開一頁WP:技術新聞專放通知。對分拆本身冇特別傾向,睇社群決定。另外,啱啱發現粵維曾經有用Wikipedia:城市論壇 (消息)呢版,我搵唔到點解後尾會廢棄,係咪有咩特別原因?Sun8908傾偈2022年5月23號 (一) 14:37 (UTC)[回覆]
有關Tech news一項,多數嘅維基亦都會放喺「技術」版上面,如果有人翻譯咗做粵文嘅話,噉呢樣嘢就會用粵文表示,只不過未有人去譯只能用原文亦即係英文表示。Tech news喺大體意思上都算係屬於同技術上面有關嘅範疇嚟。 Shinjiman 2022年5月24號 (二) 02:14 (UTC)[回覆]
m:Global message delivery/Targets/Tech ambassadors,見到cawiki同eowiki都有獨立一版(ca:Viquipèdia:Tech Newseo:Vikipedio:Teknikaj novaĵoj),而有維基係又有放喺城市論壇技術版又放喺獨立一版(arwiki、enwiki)。所以如果社群想放喺另外一版/額外一版都似乎唔係唔得。Sun8908傾偈2022年5月24號 (二) 02:47 (UTC)[回覆]
我贊成開新一版專放Tech news,而家Wikipedia:城市論壇 (技術)大部份都係Tech news,影響正常技術討論。--Kowlooner (傾偈) 2022年5月29號 (日) 12:09 (UTC)[回覆]