Template:Unreliable source?

出自維基百科,自由嘅百科全書
跳去導覽 跳去搵嘢

[unreliable source?]

模解[] [] [] []

用法[編輯]

This template is intended to be used when a statement is sourced but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement. It produces a superscripted notation like the following:

It was actually written by Francis Bacon.[unreliable source?]

Articles tagged with this template will be categorized into Category:All articles lacking reliable references.

Place this template inline, {{Unreliable source?|date=8月 2022}} following the questionable claim (and any punctuation attached to it). The template should be placed outside the reference (<ref> ... </ref>), within the article's text:

Potentially controversial statement.<ref>some alleged source for this</ref>{{Unreliable source?|date=8月 2022}} Next sentence.

參數[編輯]

The template has the following optional parameters:

  • date: should be set to the month and year when the article was tagged. Example: {{Unreliable source?|date=8月 2022}}
  • reason: a note explaining why you think the source is unreliable as per WP:RS. Displays as a tool tip. Keep it short (one sentence) as longer material belongs on the talk page. It is good to reiterate the reason in your edit summary. Example: {{Unreliable source?|reason=Your WP:RS-based reason here.|date=8月 2022}}
  • sure or certain: if set to "y" or "yes" will remove the question mark from the template's output to denote a degree of certainty that the source is unreliable. Please use this with a |reason= parameter, and only after a good faith attempt to verify the reliability of the source in question. Example: {{Unreliable source?|sure=y|reason=Your WP:RS-based reason here.|date=8月 2022}} NOTE: This parameter has an alias, |failed=, which may make more grammatical sense when used with certain redirects like {{verify credibility}}.

幾時使用同唔使用呢個模[編輯]

This template should be used to express your doubt about the credibility of a source.

This tag should not be used on unreliably sourced contentious statements about living persons; if a source for such a statement is not reliable, the statement and the source should be removed immediately.

For whole articles or article sections that rely on suspect sources, considering using the banner template {{More citations needed}} or {{More citations needed section}}, respectively, rather than individually tagging a large number of statements.

For sources promoting fringe theories and pseudo-science, the more specific template {{Unreliable fringe source}} can be used. Even more specifically, flag improperly sourced medical claims with {{Unreliable medical source}}.

This tag should not be used to indicate that the sourced material could not be found within a given source. In that case, {{failed verification}} is a better template. For statements that have failed verification and have a questionable would-be source, consider removal of the source (and possibly the statement) over using both tags.

模數據[編輯]

呢個係用喺呢個模嘅TemplateData解,用喺VisualEditor同埋其它工具度;睇吓呢個模嘅每月錯誤報告

TemplateData for Unreliable source?嘅TemplateData

Used when a statement is sourced but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement.

模參數

呢個模,建議一行過寫晒所有參數。

參數描述狀態
Reasonreason

Note explaining why you think the source is unreliable as per WP:RS. Displays as a tool tip

字串可選
Certain?certainsurefailed

If set to "y" or "yes" will remove the question mark from the template's output to denote a degree of certainty that the source is unreliable

預設
no
範例
yes
是非值可選
Month and yeardate

Month and year of tagging; e.g., 'January 2013', but not 'jan13'

自動值
{{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}
字串建議
namename

無描述

字串可選

跳轉[編輯]

The following may presently be used as shortcuts and aliases for this template:

睇埋[編輯]

Inline templates[編輯]

Lists of templates[編輯]

Policies, guidelines, essays, and WikiProjects[編輯]