Template:Unreliable source?

出自維基百科,自由嘅百科全書
跳去導覽 跳去搵嘢

[unreliable source?]

模解[] [] [] []

用法[編輯]

This template is intended to be used when a statement is sourced but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement. It produces a superscripted notation like the following:

It was actually written by Francis Bacon.[unreliable source?]

Articles tagged with this template will be categorized into Category:All articles lacking reliable references.

Place this template inline, {{Unreliable source?|date=1月 2023}} following the questionable claim (and any punctuation attached to it). The template should be placed outside the reference (<ref> ... </ref>), within the article's text:

Potentially controversial statement.<ref>some alleged source for this</ref>{{Unreliable source?|date=1月 2023}} Next sentence.

參數[編輯]

The template has the following optional parameters:

  • date: should be set to the month and year when the article was tagged. Example: {{Unreliable source?|date=1月 2023}}
  • reason: a note explaining why you think the source is unreliable as per WP:RS. Displays as a tool tip. Keep it short (one sentence) as longer material belongs on the talk page. It is good to reiterate the reason in your edit summary. Example: {{Unreliable source?|reason=Your WP:RS-based reason here.|date=1月 2023}}
  • sure or certain: if set to "y" or "yes" will remove the question mark from the template's output to denote a degree of certainty that the source is unreliable. Please use this with a |reason= parameter, and only after a good faith attempt to verify the reliability of the source in question. Example: {{Unreliable source?|sure=y|reason=Your WP:RS-based reason here.|date=1月 2023}} NOTE: This parameter has an alias, |failed=, which may make more grammatical sense when used with certain redirects like {{verify credibility}}.

幾時使用同唔使用呢個模[編輯]

This template should be used to express your doubt about the credibility of a source.

This tag should not be used on unreliably sourced contentious statements about living persons; if a source for such a statement is not reliable, the statement and the source should be removed immediately.

For whole articles or article sections that rely on suspect sources, considering using the banner template {{More citations needed}} or {{More citations needed section}}, respectively, rather than individually tagging a large number of statements.

For sources promoting fringe theories and pseudo-science, the more specific template {{Unreliable fringe source}} can be used. Even more specifically, flag improperly sourced medical claims with {{Unreliable medical source}}.

This tag should not be used to indicate that the sourced material could not be found within a given source. In that case, {{failed verification}} is a better template. For statements that have failed verification and have a questionable would-be source, consider removal of the source (and possibly the statement) over using both tags.

模數據[編輯]

呢個係用喺呢個模嘅TemplateData解,用喺VisualEditor同埋其它工具度;睇吓呢個模嘅每月錯誤報告

TemplateData for Unreliable source?嘅TemplateData

Used when a statement is sourced but it is questionable whether the source used is reliable for supporting the statement.

[管理TemplateData]

模參數

呢個模,建議一行過寫晒所有參數。

參數描述狀態
Reasonreason

Note explaining why you think the source is unreliable as per WP:RS. Displays as a tool tip

字串可選
Certain?certainsurefailed

If set to "y" or "yes" will remove the question mark from the template's output to denote a degree of certainty that the source is unreliable

預設
no
範例
yes
是非值可選
Month and yeardate

Month and year of tagging; e.g., 'January 2013', but not 'jan13'

自動值
{{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}
字串建議
namename

無描述

字串可選

跳轉[編輯]

The following may presently be used as shortcuts and aliases for this template:

睇埋[編輯]

Inline templates[編輯]

Lists of templates[編輯]

Policies, guidelines, essays, and WikiProjects[編輯]