Wikipedia:假定善意
出自維基百科,自由嘅百科全書
| 呢篇文或者呢段要 翻譯(或者由 en:Wikipedia:Assume good faith 加料)。請譯佢。 而家譯咗1%,上次編輯:2009年9月24號 08:57。(翻譯指引) |
| 一句講晒: 假定嚟呢度寫嘢、改嘢、整嘢嘅人係嚟幫手,唔係嚟搞搞陣、搞破壞嘅。 |
| 維基百科政策 |
| 行為標準 |
| 假定善意 機械人 禮貌 編輯政策 唔好訴諸法律威脅 唔好人身攻擊 文章擁有權 Sock puppetry 三次回退規則 用戶名 破壞 |
To assume good faith is a fundamental principle on Wikipedia. In allowing anyone to edit, we must assume that most people who work on the project are trying to help it, not hurt it. If this weren't true, a project like Wikipedia would be doomed from the beginning. When you can reasonably assume that a mistake someone made was a well-intentioned attempt to further the goals of the project, correct it without criticizing. When you disagree with people, remember that they probably believe that they are helping the project. Consider using talk pages to explain yourself, and give others the opportunity to do the same. This can avoid misunderstandings and prevent problems from escalating. Good faith is obviously not bad faith.
Be patient with newcomers. Newcomers unaware of Wikipedia's unique culture and the mechanics of Wikipedia editing often make mistakes or fail to respect community norms. It is not uncommon for a newcomer to believe that an unfamiliar policy should be changed to match their experience elsewhere. Similarly, many newcomers bring with them experience or expertise for which they expect immediate respect. Behaviors arising from these perspectives are not malicious.
Take special care not to apply the principle of "Ignorantia juris non excusat" (Latin for: "ignorance of the law does not excuse"). This is incompatible with the policies of not biting newcomers and assuming good faith. Assuming good faith means in part knowing that people come in not understanding our policies and guidelines.
Assuming good faith is about intentions, not actions. Well-meaning people make mistakes, and you should correct them when they do. You should not act like their mistake was deliberate. Correct, but do not scold. There will be people on Wikipedia with whom you disagree. Even if they are wrong, that does not mean they are trying to wreck the project. There will be some people with whom you find it hard to work. That does not mean they are trying to wreck the project either. It is never necessary that we attribute an editor's actions to bad faith, even if bad faith seems obvious, as all our countermeasures (i.e. reverting, blocking) can be performed on the basis of behavior rather than intent.
This guideline does not require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of evidence to the contrary. Actions inconsistent with good faith include repeated vandalism, confirmed malicious sockpuppetry, and lying. Assuming good faith also does not mean that no action by editors should be criticized, but instead that criticism should not be attributed to malice unless there is specific evidence of malice. Editors should not accuse the other side in a conflict of not assuming good faith in the absence of reasonable supporting evidence.
目錄 |
[編輯] See also
[編輯] Guidelines
[編輯] Essays
- Wikipedia:Assume the assumption of good faith
- Wikipedia:Honesty
- Wikipedia:Assume the presence of a belly-button
- Wikipedia:No angry mastodons
- Wikipedia:On assuming good faith
- Wikipedia:Assume bad faith
- Wikipedia:Wiki spirit
- Wikipedia policy should follow the spirit of ahimsa (from meta)
- MeatBall:AssumeGoodFaith (from MeatballWiki)