User talk:Enryhen

2022年4月

唔該停手。如果你繼續好似亂改黎智英咁樣亂改啲文，會封咗你，一段時間內唔可以編輯維基百科。唔重要嘅人 (傾偈) 2022年4月21號 (四) 14:43 (UTC)

由於你搞搞震，你已經被鎖三日，喺封鎖期內冇得編輯維基百科。

如果你認為你有合理嘅理由可以解除封鎖，請喺討論頁上嘅封鎖通知下加埋下列嘅文字：{{unblock|你嘅理由 ~~~~}}。

唔重要嘅人 (傾偈) 2022年4月22號 (五) 08:17 (UTC)

呢位受封鎖用戶嘅解封請求已經由一位管理員重新審視並拒絕咗。 其他管理員亦可以重審呢次封鎖，但無合理原因嘅話唔應該推翻個決定（睇下封鎖政策）。如果對你嘅封鎖未過期嘅話，唔好剷走呢個模。

Enryhen (封鎖記錄 • 現時封鎖 • 全域封鎖 • 貢獻 • 已刪貢獻 • 過濾器記錄 • 開戶記錄 • 改封鎖設定 • 解封)

---

請求解封原因：

Enryhen (talk) 10:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC) 是咁的我前兩日呢就喺黎智英嗰個專頁嗰度嘅蘋果日報同埋所旗下嘅壹週刊 ［起香港特別行政區國安法生效之前嘅新聞機構］附加咗一句就係： （已停運, 並被當地法律己關控訴, 請分別信息真偽）（起註釋嗰度）, 我想知道有啲乜嘢問題, 我完全冇任何偏頗嘅意思, 有啲別有用心嘅人就誹謗我 User:唔重要嘅人, 話我搞搞震, 希望佢自重。我要求解封並合理適當地封鎖 User:唔重要嘅人，唔該。 {Translated} I added this two days ago to Apple Daily on Jimmy Lai's special page and Next Weekly [They are both news organizations before the National Security Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region takes effect]. The sentence I wrote is: "(The organization has been prosecuted by the legal department in Hong Kong, please distinguish the authenticity of the information)" in footnotes, I want to know what the problem is, this one has no bias at all, and people say that I am messing around!? I want to point out User:唔重要嘅人, who has done this to me. I'm asking for unblocking and reasonable and appropriate blocking of User:唔重要嘅人, thank you.

拒絕原因：

Special:Diff/1808578: Legal threats. ——Z423X5C6（傾偈） 2022年4月22號 (五) 10:52 (UTC)