Wikipedia:管理戰
| 呢頁喺英文維基百科嘅對應頁係一項正式政策,但粵語維基百科重未達成共識。所以內容只供參考。 請參照英文版嘅對應頁或討論頁以進一步完善內容,提議同參與討論佢係唔係可以成為粵語維基百科嘅正式政策同指引。 |
呢篇文或者呢段要 翻譯(或者由 en:Wikipedia:Wheel war加料)。 |
「管理戰」[註 1]又名「管理員操作戰」、「管理員拉鋸戰」、「車轆戰」同埋「車輪戰」等等,指兩個或更多意見相左嘅管理員互相取消對方嘅操作,其中最常見嘅形式包括:
- 單方面解封另一個管理員封鎖嘅用戶、或者單方面封鎖另一個管理員解封嘅用戶;
- 單方面解除另一個管理員對某篇文章嘅保護、或者單方面保護另一個管理員解除保護嘅文章;
除非有正當到無懈可擊、滴水不漏嘅原因, 否則管理員唔可以明知另一名管理員反對都重重複先前嘅行政操作。此外,管理員亦都唔可以喺未拆掂數之前繼續取消其他當事管理員嘅行政操作。違反相關政策嘅管理員將會受到仲裁委員會或者大老闆本人嘅嚴厲懲罰,包括暫時封鎖同解職,就算係初犯都無得傾。
係 a struggle between 兩個或者以上 管理員 in which they undo one another's administrative actions — specifically, unblocking and reblocking a user; undeleting and redeleting; or unprotecting and reprotecting a page. Do not repeat an administrative action when you know that another administrator opposes it. Do not continue a chain of administrative reversals without discussion.
Wheel warring has been used as grounds for immediate revocation of adminship following Arbitration in a number of cases. For summaries and citations of relevant arbitration cases, and example scenarios, see /Examples.
Possible indications and alternatives
[編輯]Possible indications of wheel warring are:
- Administrators getting too distressed to discuss something.
- An administrator undoes another administrator's actions without consultation.
- An administrator deliberately ignores an existing discussion (often at the Administrators noticeboard/Incidents or Deletion review) and implements their own preferred action or version of an edit.
- An administrative action is repeatedly performed and reversed (by anyone).
If you feel the urge to wage wheel war, try these alternatives:
- Discuss the substantive issue with opposing administrators.
- Post the issue to AN and wait for comment from other administrators.
- Seek dispute resolution, just as you would in case of a potential edit war.
- Have a nice cup of tea or coffee and a sit down
Wikipedia works on the spirit of consensus; disputes should be settled through civil discussion rather than power wrestling.
ArbCom enforcement
[編輯]In November 2008, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion which stated that administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except:
- (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or
- (b) following a clear, substantial, and active community consensus to do so.
External links
[編輯]插注
[編輯]參考
[編輯]- ↑ "Are You a "Big Wheel" or a "Fifth Wheel"?". Voice of America (英文). 2016-08-27. 喺2025-06-24搵到.