Talk:草人謬論

出自維基百科,自由嘅百科全書
Jump to navigation Jump to search

同 equivocation[1], [2],

Things are said to be named 'equivocally' when, though they have

a common name, the definition corresponding with the name differs for each. Thus, a real man and a figure in a picture can both lay claim to the name 'animal'; yet these are equivocally so named, for, though they have a common name, the definition corresponding with the name differs for each. For should any one define in what sense each is an animal, his definition in the one case will be

appropriate to that case only.

有乜唔同?* -- :-) Hillgentleman | | 二零零七年七月二十四號(星期二)格林尼治 03時13分37秒。

@WikiCantonaDeryck ChanS7w4j9ShinjimanWilliam915KowloonerHenryLi
@Cedric tsan cantonaisHelpcanbepowerful昏君广州阿沾SC96PQ77wdRoy17

查實我覺得呢篇都可以試吓做好文。恐狼博士 (傾偈) 2018年9月4號 (二) 00:55 (UTC)

咁其實「偷換概念」同「草人謬論」係咪同一樣嘢?同埋個「草」使唔使講明係「稻草人」?好少聽「草人」呢個無咗個「稻」字嘅講法,無論講個農業用具定係邏輯謬論都係。 翹仔 (傾偈) 2018年9月4號 (二) 09:24 (UTC)
@Deryck Chan 係咩?我聽過廣東話有人嗌做「草人」... 不如大家投個票啦。恐狼博士 (傾偈) 2018年11月5號 (一) 04:58 (UTC)
你聽過就信你啦。翹仔 (傾偈) 2018年11月5號 (一) 10:47 (UTC)